Search The Database
| Location | Gear | Catch | Technique | Bycatch species | Type | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aegean coast, Türkiye |
Hooks and Lines
|
Multi-species |
Circle hooks
|
Sea Turtles, Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle), Chelonia mydas (Green sea turtle) | Field study in the wild | Paired trials were conducted to compare standard gillnet, trammel nets, and set longlines in Türkiye with several different types of modifications: LED (LP Electralume, 520–530 nm; 18,000–20,000 mcd) and UV-LED devices (LP Electralume, 395–400 nm; 12,000 mcd) and C-type fishing hooks. Compared to control nets, LED and UV-illuminated gillnets and trammel nets reduced the biomass of commercial species catch by 54-75%, and there was no significant reduction in the catch of vulnerable species, including elasmobranchs and sea turtles. Circle hooks reduced commercial catch by 77% compared to standard J-hooks and similarly had a higher proportion of vulnerable species (noting no sea turtles were captured in the control or treatment longline sets). These somewhat unexpected findings may have been influenced by study design limitations (small sample size) or other variables, including high turbidity and larger gear mesh sizes. Additional research is planned. No reduction in catch of vulnerable species; sea turtles were not encountered in either control or treatment sets |
Conception Bay, Canada |
Pots
|
Snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) |
Excluder devices
|
Crustaceans, Chionoecetes opilio (Snow crab) | Field study in the wild | Four experimental snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) conical pots with non-selective, small mesh jackets and collars of 180 mm, 240 mm, 300 mm, and 180 mm with a 51 mm lip, were compared with small mesh pots with no collar and traditional pots with traditional mesh in Conception Bay, Canada. Smaller collars did not improve catch efficiency (but did not significantly reduce target catch), and caught large amounts of sub-legal and female crabs. Additionally, larger collars substantially reduced catch of target-sized crabs (although sub-legal catch was also reduced). Future work will integrate escape gaps to assist escapement. External plastic collars did not meaningfully improve size selectivity |
Biddeford, Maine, United States |
N/A |
Excluder devices
|
Elasmobranchs, Sharks, Squalus acanthias (Spiny dogfish) | Study in the lab | This study examined the effectiveness of three electronic bycatch reduction devices with different signal frequencies and duty cycles (100% duty cycle fixed signal, 50% duty cycle fixed signal, 100% duty cycle quasi-random signal) in a laboratory experiment on Atlantic dogfish (Squalus acanthias). The results suggest that time-varying electrical signals can deter spiny dogfish from baited hooks. The researchers observed a reduction in bait consumption, mean bite rate, and probability of bait consumption from all three prototypes . The lowest bait consumption occurred with the 100% duty cycle, fixed-signal BRD, while the largest treatment differences resulted from the BRD with 100% duty cycle emitting a quasi-random frequency. Reduction of interactions with bait; Higher duty cycle had a higher sustained deterrent effect |
|
Yawuru Nagulagun Marine Park (Roebuck Bay), Broome, Western Australia |
Gillnets and Entangling Nets
|
Barramundi (Lates calcarifer) and other teleosts |
Electromagnetic deterrents
Visual deterrents
|
Elasmobranchs, Skates/Rays, Anoxypristis cuspidata (Narrow sawfish), Pristis clavata (Dwarf sawfish), Pristis zijsron (Longcomb sawfish) | Field study in the wild | The study evaluated if green LED lights and pulsed electrical deterrents (SharkGuard) could reduce bycatch of threatened elasmobranchs in Northern Australia gillnet fisheries. 23 paired deployments of LED lights (Fishtek Marine) and 7 electric deterrent trials were analyzed. Nets with green LED lights caught 35% fewer elasmobranchs, while also resulting in a significant increase (76%) of bony fish catch (however, commercially-targeted species of bony fish were not caught significantly more in the LED nets). Electric deterrents did not significantly reduce bycatch or fish catch, however, the small sample size limits the ability to detect meaningful effects. Both green LEDs and electric deterrents showed moderate effects related to reduced sawfish (Pristis clavata, P. zijsron, Anoxypristis cuspidata) catch per unit effort (CPUE), particularly for the electrical deterrents, which could be explored in a larger study. Nets with green LED lights caught 35% fewer elasmobranchs; electric deterrent had not significant effect |
N/A |
Hooks and Lines
|
Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) |
Alternative leader design
Artificial bait
|
Elasmobranchs, Seabirds, Sea Turtles | Summary study | Studies in the Mediterranean and Atlantic swordfish (Xiphias gladius) fisheries have reported that looplines/traplines or Meka-rings are increasingly being used. Loop lines consist of concentric monofilament loops attached to the branch line, replacing conventional hook and bait. Available evidence suggests that this device may enhance swordfish catch rates while exhibiting high selectivity and reduced bycatch of non-target species (less bait in the water attracts fewer predators and scavengers). However, looplines may also have drawbacks, including more stress on the captured organism and increased drag during retrieval. In addition, loop lines are not yet formally recognized as a separate gear type, which may impact fisheries management. |